Polar bear, a species threatened with extinction The polar bear has become an icon for global warming in political and public arenas. Because sea ice is an essential component of the polar bears’ ecosystem, a change in its distribution and longevity due to global warming could profoundly affect the species’ future. Because of this impending threat of the loss of sea ice, polar bears were listed as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 2008. Zoos are strategically breeding this species in efforts to develop a self-sustaining population in Zoo’s while employing these charismatic ambassadors to educate visitors about global warming and wildlife conservation. CREW is Saving Species with Science® Through the use of assisted reproduction and sound scientific technologies, CREW scientists in the Animal Research Division are Saving Species with Science®. CREW’s research results broaden our knowledge and understanding of animal biology, increases genetic diversity among polar bears in human care, connects polar bears in Zoo’s and wild populations and conserves imperiled animals in their natural environment. How is CREW helping polar bears? click to enlarge Polar Bear Updates NewsMore NewsCan a Canine Detect Polar Bear Pregnancy?November 4, 2013Zoo Paves Path On Polar Bear ReproductionJune 4, 2012Local Teens Helping Polar BearsApril 2, 2012Cincinnati Student Travels to See Wild Polar BearsSeptember 27, 2010Cincinnati Zoo Using Wind Power to Go GreenJune 23, 2010 On the Blog… Doing Our Part to Help Wild Polar BearsThe Power of Connections: Endangered Species DayHelping Scientists Assess the Body Condition of Polar Bears in the Wild Monitoring female reproduction Monitoring the reproductive processes of females Scientists at CREW have been studying polar bear reproduction since 2008 and have monitored over 55 bears at 24 institutions. Fecal samples are collected 3-7 times/week and assayed for steroid hormone metabolite concentrations, specifically testosterone and progesterone, which are indicators of ovarian activity and pregnancy/pseudo-pregnancy, respectively. Results indicated that fecal steroid metabolites may be used to indicate ovulation has occurred, but cannot be used to distinguish pregnancy from pseudo-pregnancy. Although fecal steroid concentrations have provided valuable insight into which females are experiencing estrus and ovulating, it does not allow for the discernment between pregnancy and pseudopregnancy. A diagnostic pregnancy test not only would be useful in identifying pregnant females, it may also provide clues as to where the pregnancy process might be failing in so many of these females that fail to produce cubs. Additionally, the test may be useful in other species that experience pseudo-pregnancy as well, such as otters and red pandas. Because we have exhausted all known tests of fecal products that have been used to diagnose pregnancy in other species, it is evident that a novel avenue must be pursued. Project Details Fecal proteins Specific proteins may exhibit altered profiles in the feces of pregnant bears, but predicting appropriate candidate proteins to investigate is speculative at best. The objective of this study is to identify potential pregnancy biomarker proteins based on their increased abundance in the feces of pregnant polar bears compared to pseudo-pregnant females using two-dimensional in-gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) and mass spectrometry (MS). On average, 2200 proteins or protein fragments were present in each sample, but only five were found to be elevated significantly in the pregnant group. Of those five, transthyretin (TTR) was chosen as the first biomarker to explore further because it is produced by the placenta, so its association with the pregnant state is clear. Antibodies have been identified that detect the excreted form of the polar bear TTR protein and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been developed to quantify TTR concentrations in protein extracted from feces. The final step of the project (currently underway) involves comparing TTR excretion patterns among confirmed pregnant, pseudo-pregnant, and control bears. To do this, protein is being extracted from nearly 800 fecal samples to compare TTR concentrations among groups throughout the year and will be assayed for TTR concentrations. Not only would the validation of a pregnancy biomarker be useful in diagnosing pregnancy, but it may also provide insight into the prevalence and timing of pregnancy loss that may be occurring in females that breed but fail to produce cubs. Sniffer dog project (project completed) Over three years, a detection dog was trained to distinguish fecal samples originating from pregnant bears from all other samples. Although “Elvis” consistently signaled positively on novel samples from pregnancies on which he was trained, he did not signal positively on novel samples from novel pregnancies. We suspect that he has either memorized the scent signatures of the pregnancies on which he was trained and has not generalized his recognition to novel pregnancies or that the scent signature of the samples changes with time, impacting his analysis. However, because he is able to distinguish the pregnant (post-breeding) from the non-pregnant (pre-estrus) state in those pregnancies, testing is underway to determine the earliest pregnancy may be detectable. Fecal volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis (in process) In a project closely related to the sniffer dog project, volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis was performed on over 40 polar bear fecal samples to identify the chemicals present in the airspace above fecal samples. Of the 2705 different compounds identified, none was unique to pregnant bears or present in significantly higher concentrations in the pregnant versus pseudo-pregnant bears. Researchers at CREW are collaborating with analytical chemists to mine the complex dataset in an attempt to decipher the chemical signature associated with pregnancy. Male seasonality Monitoring male seasonality In an effort to determine the source of low reproductive success in polar bears in zoos, an important objective of CREW’s polar bear project was to characterize testosterone concentrations in males in human care to verify that they are experiencing increases in testosterone during the breeding season. Furthermore, because polar bears in zoos generally live at lower latitudes and warmer climates relative to their wild cousins, they may provide insight into the ability of wild bears to adapt to a changing environment. In 2012, scientists at CREW completed a 3-yr study in which they monitored fecal testosterone concentrations in 14 adult male polar bears residing in 13 zoos ranging in location from Alaska to Arizona. Fecal samples were collected once per week year round, frozen, and shipped to CREW for analysis. Factors such as season, age, latitude, and the presence of females were evaluated to ascertain their effects on testosterone concentrations. Results showed that testosterone is significantly higher during the breeding season (Jan-May) compared to the rest of the year, similar to wild bears. Even males that did not breed or were not housed with females experienced seasonal testosterone increases, albeit lower concentrations than breeding males. Testosterone was lowest in the younger males, peaked when a male is ~10-18 years old, and then decreased with old age. Overall, latitude did not affect testosterone concentrations, although males at lower latitudes tended to exhibit lower testosterone during the summer months. It is unlikely that decreased testosterone in the summer would inhibit male fertility because the breeding season occurs at the end of the coldest months when testosterone concentrations were similar among all latitude groups. In conclusion, males in human care experience seasonal fluctuations in testosterone appropriate to the breeding season, comparable to their wild counterparts. There is no evidence that diminished seasonal cues or seasonal asynchrony between the sexes is responsible for low reproductive success in zoos. Results from this study do not reveal aberrations in testosterone production that would negatively affect the fertility of male polar bears in zoos. Sexual maturity study Monitoring sexual maturation in polar bears Polar bears in zoos generally are recommended for breeding starting around the age of five or six and then it may take a few years for them to conceive; however, recent DNA analysis of the wild population indicates that males as young as two or three may sire offspring and females as young as four can produce cubs. One of the aims of CREW’s Polar Bear Signature Project is to determine when juveniles become sexually mature; it is the first study to perform longitudinal fecal hormone monitoring on young polar bears throughout sexual maturation. With so few cubs born each year, it’s important that every sexual mature individual be paired for breeding to increase the chances of pregnancies and births. Because there are so few young individuals in the zoo population, compiling a complete dataset has been slow, however; the preliminary results are in: data indicate that males and females as young as three begin exhibiting seasonal changes in excretion patterns of steroid hormone metabolites, suggesting the onset of sexual maturation. Interestingly, one three-year-old female even exhibited a pseudo-pregnancy, despite the fact that breeding did not occur. Deciphering the fluctuations in hormone patterns associated with sexual maturity may allow for more appropriate breeding recommendations and will establish a knowledge-base of normal hormone patterns for juvenile polar bears. Since longitudinal sampling from wild individuals is logistically challenging, information learned from the zoo population may be applied to their wild cousins as well. Developing assisted reproductive technologies Developing and Optimizing Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in Polar Bears Semen collection and cryopreservation. Due to growing concern over reproductive failure in polar bears nationwide, CREW scientists are receiving requests from other zoological institutions to perform assisted reproductive procedures, such as artificial insemination (AI). A polar bear sperm bank is vital in supporting AI endeavors; however, the traditional method of semen collection from wildlife, electro-ejaculation, has been relatively unsuccessful in polar bears. Our compelling preliminary research has evaluated the use of a novel, minimally-invasive method of semen collection in this species. Although the mechanism is not well understood, there are reports of certain anesthetic drugs inducing ejaculation or causing semen to pool in the urethra in other species. One drug, medetomidine, seems to have this effect and also is already commonly used to anesthetize polar bears in zoos. To retrieve the sperm, a catheter is threaded into the urethra, a syringe is attached to the end of the catheter, and the catheter containing the sperm is slowly withdrawn. The procedure can be performed opportunistically at the time of a regularly scheduled physical examination and takes less than 5 minutes, so it doesn’t require a lengthy extension of anesthesia time. This new approach has resulted in an impressive 91% success rate and, for the first time, the creation of a polar bear sperm bank to store these valuable genetics is possible. A future goal is to perform semen collections on wild bears to preserve their genetics and also to investigate the impact of pollutants on the fertility of wild bears. Artificial Insemination (AI). Due to the shortage of males, potentially reproductively viable females are left without a male to breed. Consequently, the demand for developing ART is growing; however, little is known of the hormones orchestrating the intricacies of female reproduction in this species. Unlike humans and domestic species, information is non-existent regarding the use of exogenous hormones to overcome infertility in polar bears. Additionally, the need to determine the timing of hormones relative to performing an AI procedure is important to ensure that the insemination is performed around the time of ovulation. We have demonstrated successful ovulation induction in a polar bear using exogenous hormones; however, the results have been variable among individuals, so the precise hormones, dosages, and timing of administration relative to AI warrants further examination. Establishing a polar bear sperm bank and optimizing ART in this species will provide opportunities for conception to females that otherwise would not have a chance of pregnancy. Polar bear contraception Birth control that worked too well Unlike castration, which results in permanent sterility, hormonal contraceptives are considered to be temporary and reversible and, consequently, they play an integral role in managing animal population growth. Many polar bears in zoos were administered contraceptives in the early part of the 21st century due to lack of exhibit space and decreased need for additional zoo-born cubs. But more recently, the demand has risen and polar bears currently are in high demand. Contraceptive treatments were discontinued and nearly all females of reproductive age were paired for breeding; however, very few cubs are produced each year. From 2008 – 2016, CREW scientists monitored the fertility of ~30 mature female bears across North America, roughly half of which have been treated with contraceptives. Although the females that had been contracepted resumed normal breeding behaviors following treatment, only two (18%) gave birth. Both of these females had received just a single type of contraception whereas others had received different or multiple types over the years. In comparison, nearly 53% of the females that had never been contracepted produced cubs. A number of factors probably contribute to poor fertility, such as advanced maternal age and whether or not individuals had produced cubs prior to treatment, but it does appear that certain hormonal contraceptives have had unintended long term deleterious effects on the fertility of this species. Although it is unknown as to where, exactly, the pregnancy process is failing, CREW scientists are examining ways to overcome infertility to give these females a chance at motherhood. Arctic Ambassador Center CREW Links Zoo with Polar Bears International as an Arctic Ambassador Center With CREW’s expanding involvement in polar bear research, conservation and education and the Zoo’s progress in going green, it was a natural next-step to formally name the Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden one of Polar Bears International’s official Arctic Ambassador Centers. PBI Arctic Ambassador Centers are organizations endorsed by leading polar bear scientists and the AZA for actively engaging in saving polar bear habitat through greenhouse gas reductions within their organizations and communities. As such, CREW and the Zoo are committed to: 1) providing information about climate change to the local community on Zoo grounds, on the website and through special programs, 2) actively reducing our own carbon emissions and 3) maintaining our polar bears in an exhibit that meets all AZA standards. In return, we receive: 1) access to educational materials and biofacts from PBI, 2) support from PBI staff, 3) special opportunities for social networking and public relations and, perhaps most important, 4) the opportunity to engage in several unique PBI education programs. Polar Bear TrainingFirst Polar Bear AIStudbook SummaryPublicationsCollaborative Research Pioneering bear training for innovative reproductive research Many zoos recognize the value of training animals to participate voluntarily in medical procedures because it reduces stress on the animal and alleviates risks associated with anesthesia that otherwise might be necessary. Over the past few years, Cincinnati Zoo staff has made impressive strides with Berit, a female polar bear, who has acquired a remarkable repertoire of trained behaviors. In efforts to diagnose pregnancy, she has learned to push her belly against a mesh training wall and tolerate CREW scientists prodding her with an ultrasound probe. When she needed infertility treatments in the form of hormone injections, she learned to stand willingly to receive an injection in her shoulder. When CREW scientists wanted to document vulvar changes associated with different stages of estrus, she was trained to walk into a narrow transfer chute, which was closed on three sides, turn around, take three steps backwards, and then allow her tail to be lifted- a complicated sequence of behaviors which she mastered. Most recently, she learned to present her foot for blood collection, becoming one of just a handful of polar bears in the world to offer this behavior. An animal’s voluntary participation in procedures not only permits improved medical surveillance, but also provides unique opportunities for research that would not be feasible with wild bears. Due to the logistical challenges associated with collecting serial samples from the same bear in a field setting, scientists are using bears like Berit as models to learn more about the complex physiology of this species. CREW scientists pioneer assisted reproduction techniques in polar bears Despite spending two breeding seasons together, Aurora and Zero, two polar bears at the Seneca Park Zoo in Rochester, NY, have not figured things out. Aurora, a 22-year old female, produced three litters with her previous mate. Zero, a 970 lb male, had been housed with multiple females during his lifetime but never sired any cubs. Although Aurora and Zero were behaviorally compatible and were seen attempting to breed on multiple occasions, Zero was observed to suffer from ‘alignment issues’. In considering that Aurora’s fertile years may be numbered, Seneca Park staff wanted to increase their chances of producing cubs and called CREW to request help. CREW has been monitoring Aurora’s fecal hormone concentrations since 2008 and knowing that she was cycling normally, in combination of her history of being a good mother, made her an excellent candidate for artificial insemination. Artificial insemination (AI) had never been performed on a polar bear and little information is available on the anatomy of a female’s reproductive tract or of the appropriate combination of exogenous hormones that would ensure ovulation occurs at a time favorable to insemination. In addition, there are inherent risks to anesthesia and polar bears have been known to overheat while under sedation. Despite these challenges, the request presented opportunities for CREW scientists to gain more experience with semen collection from polar bears, to obtain insight into Zero’s fertility status, to acquire valuable information about inducing ovulation in a polar bear, and to learn about the tools and techniques required to inseminate a female polar bear. Although AI should only be used when natural breeding is not feasible, it is an invaluable tool for propagating species at risk for extinction. Relying on information gained from other species such as pandas and tigers, Dr. Terri Roth, Dr. Erin Curry, and Ms. Kate MacKinnon arrived in Rochester armed with a variety of tools and equipment. With the help of Seneca Park veterinarians and staff, they performed a successful electroejaculation on Zero that proved that he was producing sperm. Immediately following the sperm collection, they turned to Aurora. With the aid of an endoscope, they were able to pass a catheter through her cervix and into the uterus, where the semen was deposited. Both bears fully recovered from anesthesia and Aurora’s most recent fecal hormone concentrations indicate that she ovulated following the procedure, suggesting that the exogenous hormones administered had elicited an ovarian response. Since no test for polar bear pregnancy exists, CREW and Seneca Park are in the wait-and-see period. Polar bears usually have cubs in late autumn. Analyzing 99 years of polar bear reproduction Despite the fact that nearly all polar bears in zoos are recommended for breeding, very few cubs are born each year. Animal caretakers tend to rely on anecdotal reports regarding reproductive events, such as timing of cubbing, litter size, and cub survival. To objectively document trends in zoo polar bear reproduction, CREW researchers mined 99 years of records in the Polar Bear Studbook to characterize patterns in reproduction. Between 1912 and 2010, 697 individuals, comprising 456 litters, were born in North American zoos – 53% of the litters were singletons, 45% were twins, and only 2% were triplets. Polar bear cubbing season spanned 106 days, from Oct 11 through Jan 24, with an average cubbing date of Nov 29. Individuals born in litters of multiples were more likely to die as neonates than those born as singletons and individuals born to experienced moms lived longer than those born to first-time moms. The population reached its peak of 229 individuals in 1979, which is three times higher than the number in zoos today. Overall, the number of litters born each year was directly correlated with the total number of individuals in zoos, indicating that even though reproductive rates have seemed low in recent years, it’s in part due to fewer adults currently living in zoos. This study represents the largest analysis of polar bears in human care reproduction conducted to date and CREW scientists hope that it may serve as a reference for individuals involved in the management and care of polar bears in zoos. Recent peer-reviewed publications: Curry E, Safayi S, Meyerson R, Roth TL. (2015). Reproductive trends of polar bears in zoos (Ursus maritimus) in North American zoos: a historical analysis. Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research 3:99-106. Curry E, Wyatt J, Sorel L, MacKinnon KM, Roth TL. (2014). Ovulation induction and artificial insemination of a polar bear in a zoo (Ursus maritimus) using fresh semen. Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 45:645-649. Curry E, Roth TL, MacKinnon KM, Stoops MA. (2012). Factors influencing annual fecal testosterone metabolite profiles in male polar bears in zoos (Ursus maritimus). Reproduction in Domestic Animals 47:222-225. Stoops MA, MacKinnon KM, and Roth TL (2012). Longitudinal fecal hormone analysis for monitoring reproductive activity in the female polar bear (Ursus maritimus). Theriogenology 78: 1977-1986. Curry E, Stoops MA, Roth TL. (2012). Non-invasive detection of candidate pregnancy protein biomarkers in the feces of polar bears in zoos (Ursus maritimus). Theriogenology 78:308-314. Conference proceedings: Curry E, Roth TL, MacKinnon KM, Stoops MA. (2016). Monitoring the long-term effects of contraceptives on the fertility of polar bears in zoos (Ursus maritimus). International Congress on Canine and Feline Reproduction. Paris, France (June 22nd-25th). Curry E, Stoops MA, DeLorenzo CJ, MacKinnon KM, Roth TL. (2016). Using the ex situ population to advance the reproductive science of polar bears. 24th International Conference on Bear Research and Management. Anchorage, AK (June 12th-16th). Curry E and Roth TL. (2016). Poster presentation. A rapid, minimally-invasive method of collecting semen from polar bears. Proceedings of the International Embryo Transfer Society 42nd Annual Conference. Louisville, KY (January 23rd-January 26th). DeLorenzo C, Lynch B, Roth T, Petren K, Curry E. (2016). Poster presentation. Development of a non-invasive, fecal protein pregnancy test for polar bears. Proceedings of the International Embryo Transfer Society 42nd Annual Conference. Louisville, KY (January 23rd-January 26th). Curry E, Skogen M, Roth TL. (2014). Oral presentation. Evaluating the use of a detection dog and volatile organic compound analysis for non-invasive pregnancy diagnosis in the polar bear (Ursus maritimus). 23rd International Conference on Bear Research and Management. Thessaloniki, Greece (Oct 5th-11th). Curry E, Roth TL, MacKinnon KM, and Stoops MA. (2012). Platform presentation. Seasonal variation in fecal testosterone metabolite concentrations in male polar bears in zoos (Ursus maritimus). International Conference on Canine and Feline Reproduction. Whistler, BC (July 26th-29th). Roth TL, MacKinnon KM, and Stoops MA. (2011). Non-invasive fecal hormone monitoring for evaluating polar bear (Ursus maritimus) reproductive activity. Proceedings for the 20th International Conference on Bear Research & Management. Ottawa, ON (July 17th-23rd). Stoops MA, Vollmer L, and Roth TL. (2009). Faecal steroid analyses for monitoring reproductive function in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Reproduction, Fertility and Development 21(1) 182-183. Roth TL, MacKinnon KM, and Stoops MA. (2009). Noninvasive fecal hormone monitoring for assessing reproductive activity and diagnosing pregnancy in the polar bear (Ursus maritimus). Proceedings for Advancing Bear Care 2009, Bear Care Group. San Francisco, CA. Investigating the relationship between ambient conditions and thermoregulatory responses in polar bears (University of Guelph). By understanding links between thermoregulation demands and stress, adjustments for the zoo environment of polar bears could be suggested to reduce temperature-associated stress thus improving the probability of successful breeding in zoos. Photogrammetry analysis of polar bear images (Purdue University, University of Wyoming, and Polar Bears International). As part of the Polar Bears International citizen science project in Churchill, Manitoba, Canada, researchers are using polar bears in zoos to optimize methodologies used to study the wild population. They are developing photographic methods to measure body condition to monitor long-term trends in morphometric changes related to alteration of environmental conditions. Fecal near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) (Texas A&M). Dried fecal samples from pregnant and non-pregnant bears are scanned using a spectrometer and measurements of reflectance are recorded over the visible and near infrared ranges. If differences are found, this method could provide a non-invasive means of pregnancy diagnosis in this species. Exploring the metabolomic signature of pregnant polar bears (Cincinnati Children’s Hospital). Scientists at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center are characterizing the metabolites in polar bear fecal samples to determine if specific biomarkers or patterns are unique to pregnancy. Studies are underway to evaluate the metabolites in hundreds of samples. Polar bears (Ursus maritimus): connections between activity levels, temperature and day length (Miami University). The activity levels of zoo-housed bears at multiple facilities were assessed in relation to temperature and hours of daylight. Results of this study may help to define the conditions that polar bears in zoos should be housed in to enhance their health and behavior. Comparison of fecal and urinary steroid hormone excretion patterns in polar bears (SeaWorld San Diego). The aim of this research is to compare steroid excretion patterns in urine and feces collected from polar bears in zoos, especially those undergoing treatment for infertility. Characterization of various metabolite patterns will provide insight into the reproductive processes of this species. Evaluation of urinary and fecal hormone metabolites in pregnant polar bears (Memphis Zoo). This study aims to compare urinary and fecal steroid hormone excretion patterns in pregnant and non-pregnant polar bears. Annual fecal glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in pregnant and pseudopregnant polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in North American zoos. (Brookfield Zoo) The goal of this study was to determine if glucocorticoid concentrations are higher in the feces of pseudo-pregnant polar bears versus pregnant bears. Patterns of diversity in the indigenous microbiota of zoo mammals (Stanford University) Researchers are investigating the various microbes present in the guts of many animals, including polar bears.